Changes between Version 21 and Version 22 of The Origins of openEHR


Ignore:
Timestamp:
May 19, 2008, 8:59:33 PM (16 years ago)
Author:
KOBAYASHI, Shinji
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • The Origins of openEHR

    v21 v22  
    130130 1. The decision of the partners, in the interests of effective dissemination of the work, to publish the project results openly, within the public domain. The EU Contract in principle vested IPR for the work with the Consortium.
    131131
    132 
     132Niels Rosslingと委員会，そしてプロジェクト役員のJacques Lacombeの温かい支援を受けて，プロジェクトはごく初期の段階からずっと強力な競争相手もまた絶えることがないことが示されていた。その結果が提供されることで，徐々にそれが利用可能なものとなっており，しばしばそれが公式に発表される前に利用できた。それはEUのプレ標準化についての形式を作るCENやそれとは全く関係ないことについてもすべての段階で利用された。
    133133
    134134Warmly supported as it was by Niels Rossing and the Commission and by its Project Officer, Jacques Lacombe, the Project proved from its very earliest stages and over time not to be short of powerful opponents, as well. Its results were provided, step by step as they were available and often before official publication, into all the stages of the formulation of EU pre-standards of CEN and further afield.
    135135
    136 == The Interface between the GEHR Project and Technical Committee TC/251-Medical Informatics of CEN ==
     136== GEHRプロジェクトとCEのN医療情報技術委員会TC/251とのインターフェース ==
     137The Interface between the GEHR Project and Technical Committee TC/251-Medical Informatics of CEN
     138
     139
     140
    137141At about the same time that the AIM Programme was initiated, CEN established a standards initiative for medical informatics through its Technical Committee TC/251, led by Prof. Georges de Moor. The strategic co-ordination achieved between the AIM and CEN activities was sometimes disappointing and their goals and methods were very different. AIM was tackling the domain through extensive and well funded applied research and development in wide-ranging consortia such as GEHR. CEN, with much less resource, was tackling its role as a consensus building process, using task forces of experts to propose standards which were then voted on by national delegates. Of course, both empirical research and standards setting activities are needed to advance the field.
    138142