Changes between Version 23 and Version 24 of The Origins of openEHR
- Timestamp:
- May 20, 2008, 7:02:53 PM (16 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
The Origins of openEHR
v23 v24 141 141 At about the same time that the AIM Programme was initiated, CEN established a standards initiative for medical informatics through its Technical Committee TC/251, led by Prof. Georges de Moor. The strategic co-ordination achieved between the AIM and CEN activities was sometimes disappointing and their goals and methods were very different. AIM was tackling the domain through extensive and well funded applied research and development in wide-ranging consortia such as GEHR. CEN, with much less resource, was tackling its role as a consensus building process, using task forces of experts to propose standards which were then voted on by national delegates. Of course, both empirical research and standards setting activities are needed to advance the field. 142 142 143 GEHRプロジェクトが進められる間,CENのTC/251のもとで健康記録アーキテクチャのプレ標準を提案するプロジェクトチームが結成された。臨床からの要件やEHCRに関する初期の形式モデルについてのGEHRプロジェクトの初期の成果のいくつかが,EHCRの初期の形式モデルとしてPetter Hurlenが率いるCENプロジェクトチームに要求され提供された。このチームにはGEHRプロジェクトのメンバーの何名かが参加しており,CENの最初のプレ標準,ENV 12265として公開された。CENが発行したものをみると,その時点で利用可能であったGEHRプロジェクトの成果や概念がが幅広く利用されており,影響を受けていることが明らかである。GEHRプロジェクトはプレ標準が公開された後も開発を続けその手法を改良していた。 144 143 145 During the course of the GEHR Project, a Project Team was established under TC/251 of CEN, to propose a pre-standard health record architecture. Some early deliverables of GEHR, in formulating clinical requirements and proposing early formal models for the EHCR, were requested by and provided to the CEN project team, led by Petter Hurlen. This team, in which some members of GEHR participated, published the first CEN pre standard, ENV 12265. The extensive use and influence of GEHR project results and concepts available at that time are clear in the CEN publication. The GEHR project continued to develop and refine its approach after the pre-standard was published. 146 147 144 148 145 149 GEHR sought to work in a spirit of co-operation. Recognising its deficiencies and successively refining its results, in the public domain, was a key feature of its working method. Opposition and contrary perspectives provide an important and useful crucible for innovation. GEHR was quite radical in its approach and no doubt uncomfortable to have as a partner, as a result.