Changes between Version 23 and Version 24 of Archtectural Overview Design of the openEHR EHR
- Timestamp:
- Oct 20, 2007, 7:33:00 PM (17 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Archtectural Overview Design of the openEHR EHR
v23 v24 133 133 A well-known problem in clinical information recording is the assignment of "status" to recorded items. Kinds of status include variants like "actual value of P" (P stands for some phenomenon), "family history of P", "risk of P", "fear of P", as well as negation of any of these, i.e. "not/no P", "no history of P" etc. A proper analysis of these so called statuses shows that they are not "statuses" at all, but different categories of information as per the ontology of FIGURE 18. In general, negations are handled by using "exclusion" archetypes for the appropriate Entry type. For example, "no allergies" can be modelled using an Evaluation archetype that describes which allergies are excluded for this patient. Another set of statement types that can be confused in systems that do not properly model information categories concern interventions, e.g. "hip replacement (5 years ago)", "hip replacement (recommended)", "hip replacement (ordered for next tuesday 10 am)". 134 134 135 これらを記述するすべての型は 135 これらを記述するすべての型はopenEHRのEntry型の一つに曖昧ではない形式で直接マッピングすることができる。EHRの問い合わせが、問題のある現象に対する観察についての問い合わせがなされたときにリスクや恐れがあるといった記載のような正確でないデータにマッチしないように保証するものである。 136 136 137 137 All of these statement types map directly to one of the openEHR Entry types in an unambiguous fashion, ensuring that querying of the EHR does not match incorrect data, such as a statement about fear or risk, when the query was for an observation of the phenomenon in question. 138 138 139 openEHRの臨床情報モデルのより詳細な内容については、EHR IMについての文書のEntryセクションにある。 140 139 141 Further details on the openEHR model clinical information are given in the EHR IM document, Entry Section. 142 143 == 6.5 介入の管理 == 140 144 141 145 6.5 Managing Interventions