Changes between Version 20 and Version 21 of Archtectural Overview Design of the openEHR EHR

Timestamp:

Oct 6, 2007, 7:19:24 PM (17 years ago)

Author:

KOBAYASHI, Shinji

Comment:

--

Archtectural Overview Design of the openEHR EHR

@@ -126 +126 @@
 The key top-level categories are `care information' and `administrative information'. The former encompasses all statements that might be recorded at any point during the care process, and consists of the major sub-categories on which the Entry model is based, namely `observation', `opinion', `instruction', and `action' (a kind of observation) which themselves correspond to the past, present and future in time. The administrative information category covers information which is not generated by the care process proper, but relates to organising it, such as appointments and admissions. This information is not about care, but about the logistics of care delivery.
 
+これらの多様性にも関わらず、結局のところこの図に示された末節のカテゴリのそれぞれはプロセスモデルの型の一つ、つまりopenEHRのEntryモデルのサブタイプからなるサブカテゴリとなっている。
+
 Regardless of the diversity, each of the leaf-level categories shown in this figure is ultimately a subcategory of one of the types from the process model, and hence, of the subtypes of the openEHR Entry model.
+
+特定（こでの場合は評価）のEntryサブタイプに関連のある関心についての情報（例えば、リスク評価）を表現するために設計されたアーキタイプを利用することで、オントロジー由来のカテゴリーを正確に表現することができるようになる。Entryがこのようにモデル化されたシステムでは、
+
 
 Correct representation of the categories from the ontology is enabled by using archetypes designed to express the information of interest (say a risk assessment) in terms of a particular Entry subtype (in this case, Evaluation). In a system where Entries are thus modelled, there will be no danger of incorrectly identifying the various kinds of Entries, as long as the Entry subtype, time, and certainty/negation are taken into account. Note that even if the ontology of FIGURE 18 is not correct (undoubtedly it isn't), archetypes will be constructed to account for each improved idea of what such categories should really be.